The poem “On the Religion of Nature,” which was written by Freneau, is both inspirational and illuminating. Readers are prompted to consider the wider picture as a result of this. It is not just about the beauty that can be found in nature; it is also about the religion and tranquilly that can be found in natural settings. Through the use of literary elements that speak directly but also indirectly to the reader, he is able to convey the message he wishes to convey.
It is abundantly obvious from the language used in this poem that Freneau was an ardent supporter of the principles and characteristics of enlightenment. Freneau was opposed to the idea that a person should be obligated to worship a single god and adhere to a particular set of beliefs.
Although it is obvious that Freneau intends for readers to interpret this poem in a different light, the poem’s form lends it the air of a biblical passage. When it comes to understanding a poetry like this one, perspective is important. In lines one and two, he makes the point that a god is not the entity that bestows favours and predicts the future; rather, they are the responsibilities of nature. “That ever-blessed force of nature, which bestowed religion with the rest.” He supports lines one and two by arguing that “that force of nature, eternally blessed, bestowed religion with the rest” in lines five and six of the poem.
The readings that were assigned for this week, “On the Religion of Nature” stood out as the most notable one. Since I have a lot of personal interest in history, I generally choose to write about anything that was produced by a significant individual who had a role in the development of the United States. However, the works of Thomas Paine and Ben Franklin are generally recognised, and most people are not surprised to learn about the subjects they cover. Philip Freneau’s “On the Religion of Nature” is a very unique contribution when compared to the other pieces in this collection. Due to the fact that it is not nearly as well known or as popular, I felt that discussing it would make for an intriguing essay.
In comparison to the previous readings, this one is considerably On the religion of nature poem analysis is more analytical, and it discusses one of the most contentious topics around: religion. A rather unconventional approach to the topic of religion is taken throughout this article. Freneau makes a point of comparing religion to nature and essentially states that you do not want a priest, a church, or a revelation in order to perceive the way that God wants you to live your life. He demonstrates how the existence of God may be seen all around us in the natural world.
There is also the possibility that the author of this text is attempting to imply that God is Mother Nature. This work may be interpreted in a variety of ways by various individuals, but I feel that the artist is trying to convince those who do not believe in God that if there were no God, there would not be nearly as much natural beauty in the world. After he has written about doom and pleasure, which I thought to be extremely intriguing, Freneau pens the line “It damns them not for disbelief” at one point in his work.
This line stood out to me because I believe it can be interpreted in one of two ways: either it means that if you do not believe in God, you will be damned because you will go to hell, or it means that if you do not believe, you will make yourself damned because, at this time, religion gave structure to the majority of people. Either way, it can be interpreted as saying that if you do not believe in God, you will be damned because you will go Religion provides explanations for things that cannot be explained by science, and during periods in human history when scientific understanding of the world was limited, this was extremely important.
Simply having the hope that there is a God enables people to experience life with joy rather than fear. People who don’t believe in God are the ones who end up damning themselves because they focus on the dangers in their environment rather than taking pleasure in the life they’ve been given. The last line of the poem is also quite significant since it expresses the author’s desire that one day people would be able to reach a consensus on a single religion, at which point life will be much improved.
This makes sense due to the fact that throughout the years that this article was published, there were religious conflicts all over the globe, and it was a subject that was actively being discussed by people during these decades.
On the religion of nature poem analysis Paragraph wise
The power, that gives with liberal hand The blessings man enjoys, while here, And scatters through a smiling land bundant products of the year; That power of nature, ever blessed, Bestowed religion with the rest." (1-6).
This indicates that God does not communicate with humans by supernatural means such as a burning bush or unique revelation. You should instead consult a common shrub to find out what the natural world is trying to convey to you. Everyone has access to the enlightened belief system that is nature’s religion. This information is neither hidden nor is it a mystery; instead, it is awaiting our discovery so that we may use it. This is a profound realisation that the natural world is sharing with each and every one of us.
Born with ourselves, her early sway inclines the tender mind to take The path of right, fair virtue's way Its own felicity to make. This universally extends And leads to no mysterious ends." (7-12).
This indicates that you do not need a secret, a special revelation, a church, or a priest in order to proceed. True religion is all around you; you just have to look for it.
This viewpoint, as well as the puritans’ belief of mankind, is diametrically opposed to this. However, this suggests that humans are not depraved but rather are inherently decent, in contrast to the Puritans’ belief in utter depravity.
The Puritans held the belief that nature was the source of the issue since they felt that all people were born with wicked intentions. On the other hand, many living during the Enlightenment thought that nurturing was a negative thing. They held the belief that humans are born nice but are educated by society to behave badly. They had the misconception that in order to become a decent person, one needed to grow up in isolation, like Tarzan. The novel Lord of the Flies is a representation of the Puritans’ point of view since it shows what happens to civilised young men when they are isolated on an island. Freneau is of the opinion that we are good since nature created us, and that evil originates from other places.
"Religion, such as nature taught, With all divine perfection suits; Had all mankind this system sought Sophist would cease their vain disputes, And from this source would nations know And that can make their heaven below" (13-18).
As soon as we abandoned the natural system, we entered into sophisticated debates about different religious systems. The sophists are categorised as those who adhere to the beliefs of the Puritans, Presbyterians, Congregationalists, Quakers, and any other religious group. Is it possible to demonstrate that any religion is correct? Some people believe that other faiths are just off the mark.
This deals not curses on mankind, Or dooms them to perpetual grief, If from its aid no joys they find, It damns them not for unbelief" (19-22).
This interpretation of “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” couldn’t be farther from the truth. This indicates that if you do not believe, rather than being sent into hell, you will be left to your own devices to bring misery upon yourself.
Upon a more exalted plan Creatress nature dealt with man¾" (23-24).
The puritans held the concept that God took the form of a human. In this metaphor, nature is referred to as “mother nature.” He recasts nature as a kind mother rather than a strict father figure in the story.
Joy to the day, when all agree On such grand systems to proceed, From fraud, design, and error free, And which to truth and goodness lead: Then persecution will retreat And man's religion be complete" (25-30).
When we have natural religion, there would be no need for us to persecute one another, according to this passage. On the other hand, Freneau, much like Franklin’s missionary, who believed in “fiction, deception, and fable,” presumes that people who use a different system adhere to “fraud, design, and mistake.” During this time in France, they were using the guillotine. Natural religion is susceptible to being persecuted in the same way that other religions are.